CHARLOTTE, N.C. – Charlotte ranks among the best states for emergency medical care, maintaining a surveillance score of 24.38 with 6,510 CCTV cameras monitoring its urban landscape.
It demonstrates a moderate camera density with 714 cameras per 100,000 residents while maintaining relatively controlled crime costs at $2,506 per capita.
The Queen City’s property crime rate stands at 3,815.18 incidents per 100,000 residents, with facial recognition technology actively employed by law enforcement agencies.
A recent study by iSharing revealed the most surveilled U.S. cities by analyzing key surveillance and safety metrics across major urban areas. The research evaluated the number of CCTV cameras, cameras per 100K residents, crime rates, and crime cost per capita to determine the extent of public monitoring.
Additionally, a safety ranking was assigned based on overall security conditions, and the presence of facial recognition technology was examined to assess the role of AI-driven surveillance. The final surveillance score was calculated by weighing these factors, highlighting cities with the most extensive surveillance infrastructure relative to crime and public safety considerations.
Charlotte’s surveillance infrastructure represents a balanced approach to urban security, with a moderate camera density that aligns well with its population size.
The city’s implementation of facial recognition technology by law enforcement agencies demonstrates its commitment to leveraging advanced security tools. However, the relatively controlled crime costs suggest that the current surveillance framework is operating effectively within its scope, though there may be room for strategic expansion to further enhance public safety measures.
The surveillance metrics for Charlotte reveal an interesting correlation between monitoring intensity and crime management. With a safety ranking of 206, the city maintains a middle-ground position that suggests its surveillance strategy is yielding measurable results.
The property crime rate, while significant, remains lower than several other major urban centers, indicating that the current combination of traditional CCTV monitoring and advanced facial recognition capabilities is contributing to effective law enforcement operations. This balanced approach could serve as a model for similarly sized metropolitan areas.
You can check the full study findings by clicking here.
