Facebook Board Upholds Trump Suspension
SAN FRANCISCO — Former President Donald Trump wonβt return to Facebook β for now.
The social networkβs quasi-independent Oversight Board voted to uphold his ban from the platform after his account was suspended four months ago for inciting violence that led to the deadly Jan. 6 Capitol riot.
While uploading the suspension, the board faulted Facebook for the way it made the decision.
The board said the ongoing risk of serious violence justified Facebookβs suspension at the time, but said it βwas not appropriate for Facebook to impose an βindefiniteβ suspension.β
The board agreed with Facebook that that two of Trumpβs Jan. 6 posts βseverely violatedβ the content standards of both Facebook and Instagram.
βWe love you. Youβre very special,β he said in the first post, and βgreat patriotsβ and βremember this day foreverβ in the second. Those violated Facebookβs rules against praising or supporting people engaged in violence, the board said.
The board says Facebook has six months to reexamine the βarbitrary penaltyβ it imposed on Jan. 7 and decide on another penalty that reflects the βgravity of the violation and the prospect of future harm.β
The board says the new penalty must be βclear, necessary and proportionateβ and consistent with Facebookβs rules for severe violations.
The board says if Facebook decides to restore Trumpβs accounts, the company must be able to promptly address further violations.
Trump has also been permanently banned from Twitter.
THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. APβs earlier story follows below.
Since the day after the deadly riot at the Capitol on Jan. 6, former President Donald Trumpβs social media accounts have been silent β muzzled for inciting violence using the platforms as online megaphones.
On Wednesday, his fate on Facebook, the biggest social platform around, will be decided. The companyβs quasi-independent Oversight Board will announce its ruling around 9 a.m. ET. If it rules in Trumpβs favor, Facebook has seven days to reinstate the account. If the board upholds Facebookβs decision, Trump will remain βindefinitelyβ suspended.
Politicians, free speech experts and activists around the world are watching the decision closely. It has implications not only for Trump but for tech companies, world leaders and people across the political spectrum β many of whom have wildly conflicting views of the proper role for technology companies when it comes to regulating online speech and protecting people from abuse and misinformation.
After years of handling Trumpβs inflammatory rhetoric with a light touch, Facebook and Instagram took the drastic step of silencing his accounts in January. In announcing the unprecedented move, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg said the risk of allowing Trump to continue using the platform was too great.
βThe shocking events of the last 24 hours clearly demonstrate that President Donald Trump intends to use his remaining time in office to undermine the peaceful and lawful transition of power to his elected successor, Joe Biden,β Zuckerberg wrote on his Facebook page on Jan. 7.
A day before the announcement, Trump unveiled a new blog on his personal website, βFrom the Desk of Donald J. Trump.β While the page includes a dramatic video claiming, βA BEACON OF FREEDOM ARISESβ and hailing βA PLACE TO SPEAK FREELY AND SAFELY,β the page is little more than a display of
Trumpβs recent statements β available elsewhere on the website β that can be easily shared on Facebook and Twitter, the platforms that banished him after the riot.
While Trump aides have spent months teasing his plans to launch his own social media platform, his spokesman Jason Miller said the blog was something separate.
βPresident Trumpβs website is a great resource to find his latest statements and highlights from his first term in office, but this is not a new social media platform,β he tweeted. βWeβll have additional information coming on that front in the very near future.β
Barred from social media, Trump has embraced other platforms for getting his message out. He does frequent interviews with friendly news outlets and has emailed a flurry of statements to reporters through his official office and political group.
Trump has even said he prefers the statements to his old tweets, often describing them as more βelegant.β
Facebook created the oversight panel to rule on thorny content on its platforms following widespread criticism of its difficulty responding swiftly and effectively to misinformation, hate speech and nefarious influence campaigns. Its decisions so far β all nine of them β have tended to favor free expression over the restriction of content.
In its first rulings, the panel overturned four out of five decisions by the social network to take down questionable material. It ordered Facebook to restore posts by users that the company said broke standards on adult nudity, hate speech, or dangerous individuals.
Critics of Facebook, however, worry that the Oversight Board is a mere distraction from the companyβs deeper problems β ones that canβt be addressed in a handful of high-profile cases by a semi-independent body of experts.
βFacebook set the rules, are judge, jury and executioner and control their own appeals court and their own Supreme Court. The decisions they make have an impact on our democracies, national security and biosecurity and cannot be left to their own in house theatre of the absurd,β said Imran Ahmed, CEO Center for Countering Digital Hate, a nonprofit critical of Facebook. βWhatever the judgement tomorrow, this whole fiasco shows why we need democratic regulation of Big Tech.β
Gautam Hans, a technology law and free speech expert and professor at Vanderbilt University, said he finds the Oversight Board structure to be βfrustrating and a bit of a sideshow from the larger policy and social questions that we have about these companies.β
βTo some degree, Facebook is trying to create an accountability mechanism that I think undermines efforts to have government regulation and legislation,β Hans said. βIf any other company decided, well, weβre just going to outsource our decision-making to some quasi-independent body, that would be thought of as ridiculous.β
